| |
| Insurance Management
in Iran |
| |
| |
 |
As an integral
institution within a complex urban society, insurance
has substantially been devised to assist citizens who
venture risky enterprises which serve to promote safety,
science and wealth in a given society. Although Iranian
insurance industry is over 60 years old, serious efforts
are yet to be made to enable the mentioned industry to
play its decisive role in fostering the national economy,
laying necessary foundations for safe investment, promoting
non-oil exports and ensuring the social welfare.
Insurance industry was entirely nationalised soon after
the victory of the Islamic Revolution, however, during
pre-revolution years a state insurance company, twelve
private companies as well as two foreign insurance agencies
were also active in Iran. The Central Insurance began
to function in 1971 as the main supervisory organ, vis-a-vis
the performance of the insurance industry as a whole.
Additionally the High Council of Insurance was also formed
to make relevant regulations and oversee the activities
of various companies. |
|
 |
|
After the revolution
all existing private insurance companies as well as two
foreign agencies were closed down and only three insurance
companies, namely, Iran, Alborz and Asia were licensed
to remain active in all pertinent fields. More importantly,
due to a merger of ten nationalised insurance companies
Dana Insurance was also licensed to assume its activities
merely in individual-orientated insurance cases.
In recent years a new company called Exports and Investment
Insurance, in partnership with the Central Insurance,
other important companies and several banks, was established
to furnish the interested exporters and investors with
numerous insurance services.Presently the conceived image
of insurance is totally that of a state institution. Although
nowadays the partnership of private sector in insurance
industry seems more indispensable than ever, the mentioned
sector displays no interest in such cooperation mainly
due to limited prospects for substantial profits, vis-a-vis
that of other sectors of economy. Nevertheless, the private
sector is now participating in insurance industry only
by holding franchise offices. |
|
|
Per capita premium index |
 |
| One of significant
evaluating measures of desirability and the success of
the insurance industry is per capita premium. However,
currently it differs from country to country ranging from
US $77 in Lebanon to US $38 in Saudi Arabia, US$17.5 in
Turkey, US$ 8.3 in Egypt and US$ 4.9 in Iran. The index
demonstrates existing shortcomings in promotion and publicity
of insurance in Iran, as a vital institution encompassing
the welfare of all citizens. Fortunately to overcome this
obstacle and strengthen the country's insurance industry
not only necessary regulations are already legislated,
but particular supervisory organs are also employing all
available potentialities within the country to augment
the capacity of numerous insurance services and create
new markets. |
|
 |
Insurance
and exportation |
Insurance can bring about
lasting and stable exportation and thus, even in the developed
countries, the government plays a predominant role in
providing exporters with extensive insurance coverage.
Long-term plans as well as huge investments, posing enormous
risks, payment of liabilities to exporters without the
government's are not ensured by commercial insurance companies.
To bridge this serious gap, consequently, the state is
forced to take various risks so as to assure the unceasing
flow of the exportation. Accordingly, the protection of
interests and the guarantee would seem impossible. In
order to maintain the lasting security of commodity, capital
and the payment of liabilities to exporters "Iran
Export Guarantee Fund" was formed in 1994. Moreover,
the most significant measures taken jointly by the parliament
and the Islamic government of Iran, at the same year,
were as follows:
| n |
Ratification of
a law pertaining to appropriation and administration
of the mentioned fund. |
| n |
Membership of two
MPs in the general assembly of the fund. |
| n |
Exemption of the
fund from all the relevant state regulations. |
| n |
Allocation of 1%
of revenue generated by the imported non-governmental
goods (SIF value) for the fund. |
|
|
 |
|
|